Predicting sustainable fashion consumption intentions and practices

  • Xu, J., Zhou, Y., Jiang, L. & Shen, L. Exploring sustainable fashion consumption behavior in the post-pandemic era: Changes in the antecedents of second-hand clothing-sharing in China. Sustainability 14, 9566 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X., Wang, L. & Ding, X. Textile supply chain waste management in China. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125147 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • China Association of Circular Economy. What to Do with the 26 Million Tons of Discarded Clothing? (2021). https://www.chinacace.org/news/view?id=7191. Accessed 1 Nov 2023.

  • WRAP. Sustainable clothing action plan 2020 commitment. WRAP (2020). https://wrap.org.uk/taking-action/textiles/initiatives/scap-2020. Accessed 1 Nov 2023.

  • Borusiak, B., Szymkowiak, A., Horska, E., Raszka, N. & Żelichowska, E. Towards building sustain able consumption: A study of second-hand buying intentions. Sustainability 12, 875 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Persson, O. & Hinton, J. B. Second-hand clothing markets and a just circular economy? Exploring the role of business forms and profit. J. Clean. Prod. 390, 136139 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiong, J. The second-hand economy: A new change in consumption. Financ. Rev. 12, 92–93 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Faschan, M., Chailan, C. & Huaman-Ramirez, R. Emerging adults’ luxury fashion brand value perceptions: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. J. Glob. Fashion Mark. 11, 207–231 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • GMA. Thriving Second-hand Market in China: Opportunities and Challenges. GMA https://marketingtochina.com/chinas-thriving-second-hand-fashion-market-opportunities-and-challenges/#:~:text=The growing second-hand clothing market in China indicates a,environmental impact of fast fashion (2023).

  • Chen, L., Zheng, H. & Shah, V. Consuming to conserve: A multilevel investigation of sustainable consumption. Sustainability 14, 223 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. & Xiao, Z. The dual effects of consumer satisfaction on brand switching intention of sharing apparel. Sustainability 14, 4526 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, J., Kang, S. & Lee, K. H. How social capital impacts the purchase intention of Sustainable Fashion Products. J. Bus. Res. 117, 596–603 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baier, D., Rausch, T. M. & Wagner, T. F. The drivers of Sustainable Apparel and sportswear consumption: A segmented kano perspective. Sustainability 12, 2788 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Su, J., Watchravesringkan, K., Zhou, J. & Gil, M. Sustainable clothing: Perspectives from US and Chinese young millennials. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage. 47, 1141–1162 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, B., Zhang, Y. & Zhou, P. Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability 13, 1646 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Joanes, T. Personal norms in a globalized world: Norm-activation processes and reduced clothing consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 941–949 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henninger, C. E., Bürklin, N. & Niinimäki, K. The clothes swapping phenomenon—when consumers become suppliers. J. Fashion Mark. Manage. 23, 327–344 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Machado, M. A., Almeida, S. O., Bollick, L. C. & Bragagnolo, G. Second-hand fashion market: Consumer role in Circular Economy. J. Fashion Mark. Manage. 23, 382–395 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wai Yee, L., Hassan, S. H. & Ramayah, T. Sustainability and philanthropic awareness in clothing disposal behavior among young Malaysian consumers. SAGE Open 6, 215824401562532 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hur, E. Rebirth fashion: Secondhand clothing consumption values and perceived risks. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 122951 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, B., Wang, X., Guo, D., Zhang, B. & Wang, Z. Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behavior based on Nam and TPB models: Egoism or altruism?. Energy Policy 116, 68–77 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z. & Swisher, M. E. Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory. J. Environ. Psychol. 68, 101408 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onel, N. & Mukherjee, A. Why do consumers recycle? A holistic perspective encompassing moral considerations, affective responses, and self-interest motives. Psychol. Mark. 34, 956–971 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wolske, K. S., Stern, P. C. & Dietz, T. Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 25, 134–151 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Whitley, C. T., Takahashi, B., Zwickle, A., Besley, J. C. & Lertpratchya, A. P. Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environ. Educ. Res. 24, 245–262 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Manage. 47, 164–177 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yeap, J. A. L., Ooi, S. K., Yapp, E. H. T. & Ramesh, N. Preloved is reloved: investigating predispositions of second-hand clothing purchase on C2C platforms. Serv. Ind. J. 20, 1–25 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lang, C. & JoynerArmstrong, C. M. Collaborative consumption: The influence of fashion leadership, need for uniqueness, and materialism on female consumers’ adoption of clothing renting and swapping. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 13, 37–47 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, L. et al. Consumers’ clothing disposal behaviors in Nanjing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 276, 123184 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zahid, N. M., Khan, J. & Tao, M. Exploring mindful consumption, ego involvement, and social norms influencing second-hand clothing purchase. Curr. Psychol. 42, 13960–13974 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gomes, G. M., Moreira, N., Bouman, T., Ometto, A. R. & van der Werff, E. Towards circular economy for more sustainable apparel consumption: Testing the value-belief-norm theory in Brazil and in the Netherlands. Sustainability 14, 618 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, M., Al Mamun, A., Yang, Q. & Masud, M. M. Modeling the reuse intention and practices of secondhand clothing: Evidence from a developing nation. Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 25 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, L. & Bishop, B. A moral basis for recycling: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 36, 96–102 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies, I. A. & Gutsche, S. Consumer motivations for mainstream “ethical” consumption. Eur. J. Mark. 50, 1326–1347 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Joyner Armstrong, C. M., Connell, K. Y., Lang, C., Ruppert-Stroescu, M. & LeHew, M. L. Educating for sustainable fashion: Using clothing acquisition abstinence to explore sustainable consumption and life beyond growth. J. Consumer Policy 39, 417–439 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McEachern, M. G., Middleton, D. & Cassidy, T. Encouraging sustainable behaviour change via a social practice approach: A focus on apparel consumption practices. J. Consumer Policy 43, 397–418 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H., Olya, H. G., Cho, S. & Kim, W. Understanding museum vacationers’ eco-friendly decision-making process: Strengthening the VBN Framework. J. Sustain. Tourism 26, 855–872 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nguyen, H. V., Nguyen, C. H. & Hoang, T. T. Green consumption: Closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustain. Dev. 27, 118–129 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vehmas, K., Raudaskoski, A., Heikkilä, P., Harlin, A. & Mensonen, A. Consumer attitudes and communication in circular fashion. J. Fashion Market. Manage. Int. J. 22, 286–300 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, B., Fu, Y. & Li, Y. Young consumers’ motivations and barriers to the purchase of second-hand clothes: An empirical study of China. Waste Manage. 143, 157–167 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hammad, H., Muster, V., El-Bassiouny, N. M. & Schaefer, M. Status and sustainability. J. Fashion Market. Manage. Int. J. 23, 537–550 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kong, H. M. & Ko, E. Why do consumers choose sustainable fashion? A cross-cultural study of South Korean, Chinese, and Japanese consumers. J. Glob. Fashion Market. 8, 220–234 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pencarelli, T., Ali Taha, V., Škerháková, V., Valentiny, T. & Fedorko, R. Luxury products and sustainability issues from the perspective of young Italian consumers. Sustainability 12, 245 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J. & Harris, K. E. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. J. Consumer Affairs 35, 45–72 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bianchi, C. & Gonzalez, M. Exploring sustainable fashion consumption among eco-conscious women in Chile. Int. Revof Retail Distrib. Consumer Res. 31, 375–392 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 20, 81–97 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwartz, S. H. Normative influences on altruism. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10, 221–279 (1977).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwartz, S. H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. 50, 19–45 (1994).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarkis, A. M. A comparative study of theoretical behaviour change models predicting empirical evidence for residential energy conservation behaviours. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 526–537 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Landon, A. C., Woosnam, K. M. & Boley, B. B. Modeling the psychological antecedents to tourists’ pro-sustainable behaviors: An application of the value-belief-norm model. J. Sustain. Tourism 26, 957–972 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karpudewan, M. The relationships between values, belief, personal norms, and climate conserving behaviors of Malaysian primary school students. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117748 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H., Hwang, J., Lee, M. J. & Kim, J. Word-of-mouth, buying, and sacrifice intentions for eco-cruises: Exploring the function of norm activation and value-attitude-behavior. Tourism Manage. 70, 430–443 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H. Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. J. Sustain. Tourism 29, 1021–1042 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sánchez-García, M., Zouaghi, F., Lera-López, F. & Faulin, J. An extended behavior model for explaining the willingness to pay to reduce the air pollution in road transportation. J. Clean. Prod. 314, 128134 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H., Hwang, J. & Lee, M. J. The value–belief–emotion–norm model: Investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior. J. Travel Tourism Mark. 34, 590–607 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, M. J., Hall, C. M. & Kim, M. What is significant for engagement in cycling and walking in South Korea? Applying value-belief-norm theory. Travel Behav. Soc. 32, 100571 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J. Soc. 56, 425–442 (2000).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ünal, A. B., Steg, L. & Granskaya, J. “To support or not to support, that is the question”. Testing the VBN theory in predicting support for car use reduction policies in Russia. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 119, 73–81 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ye, Q. & Tkaczynski, A. Environmental-focused events: Saving tourism landmarks for future generations. Adv. Hosp. Leisure 20, 155–163 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vuorio, A. M., Puumalainen, K. & Fellnhofer, K. Drivers of Entrepreneurial Intentions in Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Int. J. Entrepr. Behav. Res. 24, 359–381 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schultz, P. W. & Zelezny, L. C. Values and proenvironmental behavior. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 29, 540–558 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, J. H. Determining the factors affecting the memorable nature of travel experiences. J. Travel Tourism Mark. 27, 780–796 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chua, K. B., Quoquab, F., Mohammad, J. & Basiruddin, R. The mediating role of new ecological paradigm between value orientations and pro-environmental personal norm in the agricultural context. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logistics 28, 25 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Campos-Soria, J. A., García-Pozo, A. & Marchante-Mera, A. J. Explaining tourists’ attitudes to environmental support: A multilevel approach. J. Sustain. Tourism 26, 987–1006 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liobikienė, G. & Poškus, M. S. The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere pro-environmental behavior: Modifying the value-belief-norm theory. Sustainability 11, 3324 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, J., Seo, Y. & Ko, E. Staging luxury experiences for understanding sustainable fashion consumption: A balance theory application. J. Bus. Res. 74, 162–167 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ogiemwonyi, O. et al. Environmental factors affecting green purchase behaviors of the consumers: Mediating role of environmental attitude. Cleaner Environ. Syst. 10, 100130 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Q. et al. Modelling the mass consumption potential of organic food: Evidence from an emerging economy. PLoS One 18, 14 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghazali, E. M., Nguyen, B., Mutum, D. S. & Yap, S. F. Pro-environmental behaviours and Value-Belief-Norm theory: Assessing unobserved heterogeneity of two ethnic groups. Sustainability 11, 3237 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bronfman, N., Cisternas, P., López-Vázquez, E., Maza, C. & Oyanedel, J. Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability 7, 14133–14152 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Al Mamun, A. et al. Energy conservation behavior among the Malaysian youth: a study under the premises of value-belief-norm model. Front. Energy Res. 10, 902619 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yeboah, F. K. & Kaplowitz, M. D. Explaining energy conservation and environmental citizenship behaviors using the value-belief-norm framework. Human Ecol. Rev. 22, 137–159 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nguyen, Y. T. & Nguyen, H. V. An alternative view of the Millennial Green Product Purchase: The roles of online product review and self-image congruence. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logistics 33, 231–249 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gkargkavouzi, A., Halkos, G. & Matsiori, S. Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value-belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 148, 145–156 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steg, L. & Nordlund, A. Theories to explain environmental behavior. Environ. Psychol. Introd. 20, 217–227 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J. & Bengtsson, M. Cause I’ll feel good! an investigation into the effects of anticipated emotions and personal moral norms on consumer pro-environmental behavior. J. Promotion Manage. 23, 163–183 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Q., Al Mamun, A., Naznen, F., Siyu, L. & Mohamed Makhbul, Z. K. Modelling the significance of health values, beliefs, and norms on the intention to consume and the consumption of organic foods. Heliyon 9, 25 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kiatkawsin, K., Sutherland, I. & Lee, S. K. Determinants of smart tourist environmentally responsible behavior using an extended norm-activation model. Sustainability 12, 4934 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwartz, S. H. Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: An experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 15, 283–293 (1970).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Int, An. Sia, S. K. & Jose, A. Attitude and subjective norm as personal moral obligation mediated predictors of intention to build an eco-friendly house. Manage. Environ. Qual. J. 30, 678–694 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H. Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of Green Hotel and Green Restaurant Products. Bus. Strat. Env. 29, 2815–2828 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hwang, C. G., Lee, Y.-A. & Diddi, S. Generation Y’s moral obligation and purchase intentions for Organic, fair-trade, and recycled apparel products. Int. J. Fashion Des. Technol. Educ. 8, 97–107 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diddi, S., Yan, R.-N., Bloodhart, B., Bajtelsmit, V. & McShane, K. Exploring young adult consumers’ sustainable clothing consumption intention-behavior gap: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 18, 200–209 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pristl, A., Kilian, S. & Mann, A. When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour. J. Consum. Behav. 20, 635–654 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doran, R. & Larsen, S. The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose eco-friendly travel options. Int. J. Tourism Res. 18, 159–166 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Amin, S. & Tarun, M. T. Effect of consumption values on customers’ green purchase intention: a mediating role of green trust. Soc. Responsibil. J. 17, 1320–1336 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bezençon, V., Girardin, F. & Lunardo, R. When does an ethical attribute matter for product evaluation? The role of warm-glow feelings for low-rated products. Psychol. Mark. 37, 1571–1585 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmuck, D., Matthes, J. & Naderer, B. Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect–reason–involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising. J. Advert. 47, 127–145 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ogiemwonyi, O. & Jan, M. T. The correlative influence of consumer ethical beliefs, environmental ethics, and moral obligation on green consumption behavior. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 19, 200171 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mao, S. et al. Using characteristic energy to study rural ethnic minorities’ household energy consumption and its impact factors in Chongqing, China. Sustainability 12, 6898 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, X., Wang, M. & Li, C. A summary on research of Household Energy Consumption: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 12, 316 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ramkissoon, H. Covid-19 place confinement, pro-social, pro-environmental behaviors, and residents’ wellbeing: A new conceptual framework. Front. Psychol. 11, 25 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y.-S. The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. J. Bus. Ethics 93, 307–319 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lili, Z. et al. Celebrity endorsement, brand equity, and green cosmetics purchase intention among Chinese youth. Front. Psychol. 13, 860177 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lii, Y. & Lee, M. The joint effects of compensation frames and price levels on service recovery of online pricing error. Manage. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 22, 4–20 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nuttavuthisit, K. & Thøgersen, J. The Importance of Consumer Trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. J. Bus. Ethics 140, 323–337 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taufique, K. M., Vocino, A. & Polonsky, M. J. The influence of Eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. J. Strateg. Mark. 25, 511–529 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J., Wang, S., Xue, H., Wang, Y. & Li, J. Green image and consumers’ word-of-mouth intention in the Green Hotel Industry: The moderating effect of millennials. J. Clean. Prod. 181, 426–436 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yadav, R., Balaji, M. S. & Jebarajakirthy, C. How psychological and contextual factors contribute to travelers’ propensity to choose Green Hotels?. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 77, 385–395 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ricci, E. C., Banterle, A. & Stranieri, S. Trust to go green: An exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecol. Econ. 148, 54–65 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, A., Wei, C., Zheng, M., Sun, L. & Tang, D. Influence of perceived value on repurchase intention of green agricultural products: From the perspective of multi-group analysis. Sustainability 14, 15451 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harris, J. & Hagger, M. S. Do basic psychological needs moderate relationships within the theory of planned behavior?. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 12, 43–64 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sultan, P., Tarafder, T., Pearson, D. & Henryks, J. Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour: Moderating roles of communication, satisfaction and trust in Organic Food Consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 81, 103838 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, G.-W., Akter, N., Siddik, A. B. & Masukujjaman, M. Organic foods purchase behavior among generation Y of Bangladesh: The moderation effect of trust and Price Consciousness. Foods 10, 2278 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hair, J. F. et al. An introduction to structural equation modeling. Classroom Companion Bus. 20, 1–29 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, H., Hwang, J. & Lee, M. J. The value–belief–emotion–norm model: Investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior. J. Travel Tourism Mark. 34, 590–607 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, H., Kim, J., Oh, K. W. & Jung, H. J. Adoption of eco-friendly faux leather. Clothing Textiles Res. J. 34, 239–256 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Attiq, S. et al. Sustainability of household food waste reduction: A fresh insight on youth’s emotional and cognitive behaviors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 7013 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • López-Mosquera, N. & Sánchez, M. Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J. Environ. Manage. 113, 251–262 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi, H., Jang, J. & Kandampully, J. Application of the extended VBN theory to understand consumers’ decisions about Green Hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 51, 87–95 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kock, N. Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. Partial Least Squares Path Model. 20, 245–257 (2017).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, X., Mamun, A. A., Yang, Q. & Masukujjaman, M. Examining the effect of logistics service quality on customer satisfaction and re-use intention. PLoS One 18, e0286382 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 717–731 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shrivastava, A., Jain, G., Kamble, S. S. & Belhadi, A. Sustainability through online renting clothing: Circular fashion fueled by instagram micro-celebrities. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123772 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • link

    Back To Top